HAVS and Vibration White Finger Claims
Last reviewed: June 2026 · EA Personal Injury Solicitors
Hand-arm vibration syndrome (HAVS), including vibration white finger, is nerve and blood-vessel damage caused by regular use of vibrating tools such as grinders, drills and breakers. Employers must assess and limit exposure under the Control of Vibration at Work Regulations 2005. If they failed to, you can usually claim within three years of learning your symptoms were work-related.
TL;DR — Quick Summary
Key Points
- HAVS has vascular, neurological and musculoskeletal components — all taken into account in valuing your claim
- The Control of Vibration at Work Regulations 2005 impose duties on employers
- Three-year limitation period from date of knowledge
- Anti-vibration gloves alone do not satisfy the employer's duty
- Vibration white finger is a prescribed industrial disease — Industrial Injuries Disablement Benefit may also be available
- No win, no fee — if the claim succeeds, a success fee may be deducted from your compensation
What Is Hand-Arm Vibration Syndrome?
Hand-arm vibration syndrome (HAVS) is an umbrella term for the range of conditions that can develop in the hands and arms of workers regularly exposed to hand-transmitted vibration from power tools. The syndrome has three main components:
- Vascular component — vibration white finger (VWF): episodic blanching (whitening) of one or more fingers triggered by cold. The condition is caused by damage to the small blood vessels supplying the fingers. In warm conditions, blood flow may be relatively normal; in the cold, spasm of the damaged vessels cuts off circulation, causing the affected fingers to turn white and then, on rewarming, blue and then red. This can be extremely painful.
- Neurological component (sensorineural): tingling, numbness and reduced sensation in the fingers, caused by damage to peripheral nerves. Workers may report reduced ability to feel small objects, difficulty with fine motor tasks, and persistent or intermittent "pins and needles".
- Musculoskeletal component: in more severe cases, joint damage, reduced grip strength and muscle weakening.
Employer Duties Under the Vibration Regulations
The Control of Vibration at Work Regulations 2005 require employers to assess vibration risks, take action to eliminate or reduce vibration exposure, provide health surveillance, and inform and train workers. Where daily vibration exposure exceeds the Exposure Action Value (EAV) of 2.5 m/s² A(8), employers must introduce a programme of controls. Above the Exposure Limit Value (ELV) of 5.0 m/s² A(8), exposure must not continue. Appropriate steps include selecting lower-vibration tools, limiting daily tool use time, providing tool maintenance, introducing job rotation and warm working environments.
Industries Where HAVS Claims Arise
- Construction — road breaking, drilling, compacting
- Quarrying and mining — rock drilling, scaling
- Engineering — chipping, grinding, impact wrenches
- Forestry — chainsaw operation
- Agriculture — hedge trimmers, strimming equipment
- Gas and water utilities — pipe laying, roadworks
- Shipbuilding and repair — needle scaling, chipping
Medical Assessment and Staging
HAVS is assessed using the Stockholm Workshop Scale, which grades the vascular and neurological components separately. Vascular (vibration white finger) staging is:
- Stage 0V: No attacks
- Stage 1V: Mild — occasional attacks affecting only the tips of one or more fingers
- Stage 2V: Moderate — occasional attacks affecting the distal and middle phalanges of one or more fingers
- Stage 3V: Severe — frequent attacks affecting all phalanges of most fingers
- Stage 4V: Very severe — as Stage 3V, with trophic changes in the fingertips
Neurological staging ranges from Stage 0SN (normal vibrotactile perception) to Stage 3SN (intermittent or persistent numbness reducing dexterity). The stage at diagnosis, the number of affected fingers and whether both components are present all significantly affect the compensation value.
Older Exposure: What Employers Should Have Known
For exposure before the 2005 Regulations, the courts assess what the employer knew or ought to have known about vibration risks at the relevant time, using guidance such as the Stockholm Workshop paper (1987) and British Standard BS 6842 (1987) as benchmarks. Claims based on exposure in the 1970s and 1980s can still succeed where the three-year period runs from a later date of knowledge.
No Win, No Fee HAVS Claims
We act under a Conditional Fee Agreement. You pay nothing if the claim fails. If the claim succeeds, a success fee may be deducted from your compensation.